At least 51 people, including two medical workers, were killed in Lebanon in the past 24 hours as Israeli strikes continued to pound the country in what the Lebanese Health Ministry described as a brazen violation of international law and humanitarian norms. The ministry said Israeli forces had targeted primary healthcare centres in Khalaouiyeh and Tibnin in the Bint Jbeil district on two separate occasions, killing two health workers in the attacks.

The Israeli military, the ministry said, continues to commit what it called crimes against paramedics and medical personnel, in contravention of established conventions protecting healthcare workers in conflict zones.

Ceasefire Violated Repeatedly

The strikes come even as a three-week ceasefire agreement between Lebanon and Israel — brokered and announced by the United States — remains technically in force. Now in its third week, the truce has been repeatedly violated by Israeli forces, which have continued to carry out attacks across Lebanese territory despite the accord.

Toll Since March

Since Israeli strikes resumed on March 2 this year, the Lebanese Health Ministry has recorded 2,846 deaths. Israeli forces have conducted more than 130 strikes during this period. According to the United Nations, 103 medical workers have been killed and 230 others wounded in these attacks — a toll that has drawn widespread international concern over the targeting of healthcare infrastructure.

'We Face the Threat Every Moment'

The human cost of the relentless bombardment was starkly articulated by Ali Safiyyuddin, head of the Lebanese Civil Defence in Tyre in southern Lebanon. Speaking to the media, he said: "We face the Israeli threat every moment, every day. We ask ourselves whether we will survive these strikes or not. But we know that by continuing to work here, we have already given up our lives. We have lost so many. It feels as though we, too, are already gone."

His words offered a grim testament to the conditions faced by first responders and emergency workers operating under constant threat of aerial attack in one of the most heavily struck regions of the country.

The United Nations and several humanitarian organisations have repeatedly called on Israel to halt attacks on medical facilities and personnel, warning that the systematic targeting of healthcare infrastructure constitutes a serious violation of international humanitarian law. Those calls have so far gone unheeded, with strikes continuing to claim the lives of civilians and health workers alike.

United States President Donald Trump on Sunday rejected Iran's latest proposal to end the West Asia conflict, declaring it entirely unacceptable, even as oil prices surged nearly three per cent on Monday amid fears that the diplomatic impasse could escalate into open confrontation.

Without elaborating on the specifics of Tehran's offer, Trump posted on his Truth Social platform: "I just read the response from those who purport to represent Iran. I don't like it — it is not acceptable in any way." The blunt dismissal came shortly after Iranian state media outlined the broad contours of what Tehran had proposed.

What Iran Sought

According to Iran's state-run news agency Tasnim, Tehran's proposals included compensation for damages suffered during the conflict, a lifting of the naval blockade on its ports, a binding American assurance against further strikes, removal of sanctions, and an end to the embargo on Iranian oil sales. Iran also demanded the release of Iranian assets frozen in international banks under American pressure, and sought guarantees for safe navigation through the Strait of Hormuz, as well as security arrangements in Lebanon.

Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Ismail Baghaei defended the proposals as reasonable and responsible. "Our demands are legitimate. We called for an end to the war, the lifting of the blockade, a halt to maritime piracy, and the release of frozen Iranian assets," he said, adding that safe passage through the Strait of Hormuz and broader regional security arrangements were also among Tehran's conditions.

Hormuz Tensions and Oil Markets

With negotiations deadlocked following Trump's rejection, the Strait of Hormuz — a critical chokepoint through which a significant share of global oil supplies passes — came under renewed strain. Iran has warned that it would retaliate if the United States launches strikes, and has signalled that foreign warships may no longer be permitted to enter the strait. The resulting uncertainty sent crude oil prices sharply higher on Monday, with markets registering a rise of approximately three per cent.

Trump's China Visit from Wednesday

Against this backdrop of West Asian tensions, Trump is scheduled to travel to China on Wednesday for a three-day visit — his first trip to the country since 2017. He is expected to hold meetings with Chinese President Xi Jinping on Thursday and Friday, with the agenda likely to include discussions on Iran, Taiwan, artificial intelligence, and nuclear weapons.

American officials indicated that the two leaders may also take up the extension of an existing critical minerals agreement between the two countries. The visit marks the first face-to-face talks between the leaders of the world's two largest economies in six months, and comes at a time when both nations are seeking to recalibrate trade ties strained by tariff disputes.

Americans Billed for Unbuilt Power Projects

In a separate development, millions of American consumers are being charged for electricity grid upgrades that have not yet been completed — and whose benefits remain years away. As ageing grid infrastructure prompts policymakers to accelerate modernisation, utilities across the United States are being permitted to bill customers in advance of the construction of new power plants and transmission lines, according to a Reuters report.

The move is being justified on the grounds that upfront financing will yield long-term savings, but households and businesses already grappling with elevated energy costs are set to see their bills rise further. Demand for grid upgrades has intensified amid the rapid expansion of data centres driven by artificial intelligence, adding urgency to the overhaul. Critics, however, argue that utilities should recover construction costs only after projects are completed, rather than passing financial risk on to consumers during the building phase. Individual household bills could rise by several dollars per month as a result of the pre-construction charges.

NEW DELHI — As the conflict in West Asia continues to send shockwaves across global markets and supply chains, India's top leadership swung into action on Friday, convening the first meeting of a specially constituted Informal Group of Ministers to assess the crisis and chart a coordinated national response.

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh chaired the high-powered gathering at Kartavya Bhawan-2 in New Delhi on March 28, 2026 — bringing together some of the most powerful cabinet ministers in the Modi government around a single urgent agenda: protecting India and its people from the far-reaching consequences of a conflict unfolding thousands of kilometres away.

A Cabinet of Heavy Hitters

The composition of the Informal Group of Ministers — known as the IGoM — left no doubt about the seriousness with which the government is treating the West Asia situation.

Seated around the table were Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, Petroleum and Natural Gas Minister Hardeep Singh Puri, Power Minister Manohar Lal, Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju, Chemicals and Fertilizers Minister Jagat Prakash Nadda, Consumer Affairs Minister Prahlad Joshi, Civil Aviation Minister Kinjarapu Rammohan Naidu, and Science and Technology Minister Dr. Jitendra Singh.

It was a gathering that covered virtually every sector of the Indian economy likely to feel the impact of the West Asia conflict — from fuel and energy to food supply, aviation, and industrial chemicals. The message was clear: this government is treating the crisis as a whole-of-government challenge, not a problem to be managed by any single ministry.

Rajnath Singh Sets the Tone

Defence Minister Rajnath Singh used his opening address to set a tone of calm urgency — acknowledging the seriousness of the situation while projecting confidence in India's ability to navigate it.

He emphasised the need for a proactive, coordinated, and forward-looking approach — stressing that vigilance must be maintained as the situation in West Asia continues to evolve in unpredictable ways. His guidance to the group was specific and demanding: adopt a medium to long-term preparedness approach, maintain high-level coordination across ministries, and ensure swift decision-making when the situation demands it.

"All policy efforts should remain in synergy and be implemented in a time-bound manner," Singh told the assembled ministers — a directive that reflects the government's awareness that fragmented or delayed responses could amplify the impact of an already serious global disruption.

In a post on X following the meeting, the Defence Minister made the government's commitment explicit and personal. "The Government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, is committed to safeguarding the Indian people from any impact of the conflict," he wrote — words clearly intended to reassure a public already anxious about rising fuel prices, rumours of shortages, and the spectre of broader economic disruption.

Seven Empowered Groups Brief the Ministers

The meeting was not a general discussion. It was a structured, data-driven review of India's sectoral vulnerabilities and the policy measures already deployed to address them.

Seven Empowered Groups of Secretaries — senior bureaucrats tasked with monitoring specific sectors — made detailed presentations to the IGoM, outlining the key issues identified in their respective areas and the concrete steps already taken to manage the situation.

The breadth of the presentations underscored the multi-dimensional nature of the challenge. The West Asia conflict touches virtually every pillar of the Indian economy — oil and gas supplies, fertilizer imports, shipping routes, aviation connectivity, food prices, and industrial supply chains. Each Empowered Group was directed to continue close monitoring of developments and to maintain the high-level coordination that the current moment demands.

Rajnath Singh called for constructive inputs from all ministers present — a signal that the IGoM intends to function as a genuine deliberative body, drawing on the expertise and perspective of each ministry rather than operating as a top-down directive mechanism.

States and Districts Brought Into the Loop

One of the most significant decisions to emerge from Saturday's meeting was the IGoM's reaffirmation of the critical importance of coordination with state governments and district administrations.

The crisis, the group recognised, will ultimately be felt not in the corridors of Kartavya Bhawan but in petrol stations, kitchens, hospital supply chains, and local markets across India's cities, towns, and villages. Effective management of the situation therefore requires that state and district administrations are kept fully informed, properly equipped, and capable of responding swiftly to developments on the ground.

The need for timely communication of key policy initiatives to the public was also underscored — a recognition that how the government communicates during a crisis can be as important as what it actually does.

Declaring War on Rumours and Fake News

Perhaps the most operationally significant directive to emerge from Saturday's meeting was a direct instruction to all ministries and departments regarding the management of information.

Every ministry and department has been directed to share relevant information, developments, and advisories related to the ongoing West Asia situation through the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting's WhatsApp Channel — creating a single, authoritative, government-verified stream of information accessible to citizens across the country.

The objective is twofold: to ensure that accurate, timely information reaches the public, and to actively counter the rumours, misinformation, and fake news that have already begun to circulate on social media — causing panic buying at petrol pumps, anxiety over LPG supplies, and confusion over government policy.

The directive reflects a hard lesson that governments around the world have learned from recent crises: in the age of social media, the information battle can be as consequential as the policy battle. A government that wins on policy but loses on communication will still face a crisis of public confidence.

India's Strategic Posture

Saturday's IGoM meeting represents more than a bureaucratic response to a distant conflict. It represents a deliberate strategic posture — one that says India is watching, India is prepared, and India will act to protect its people and its economy from shocks that originate beyond its borders but land within them.

The formation of the IGoM itself — bringing together defence, finance, energy, food, aviation, and science ministers under a single coordinating umbrella — reflects a sophisticated understanding of how modern conflicts cascade through interconnected global systems. The West Asia conflict is not just a military event. It is an energy event, a supply chain event, a food security event, and a financial market event — all simultaneously.

India's response, Saturday's meeting signalled, will be equally multi-dimensional.

With Prime Minister Modi personally engaged in monitoring the situation, and a cabinet-level group now meeting regularly to track developments and coordinate responses, the government is positioning itself to stay ahead of the curve — rather than react to it.

The first IGoM meeting is done. It will not be the last.

The Informal Group of Ministers on West Asia was constituted to monitor the evolving situation and recommend proactive measures. Further meetings are expected as the situation develops.